🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold policy to ban social platforms access for young people below 16 is sending ripples around the globe. Lawmakers, campaigners, and families are watching closely to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for other nations.

Across Europe Trend

Throughout Europe, a increasing number of nations are moving toward similar measures.

• Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the leader declaring that mobile devices and networks are "taking away our youngsters' youth". Legislation could be passed next year.
• The Norwegian government is planning to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to protect the young from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to verify the age and identity of social media users. Officials have indicated that an Australian-model ban could be "a potential tools on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has urged parliament to approve a law lifting the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a comparable action, including an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Netherlands has advised guardians to restrict their children from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has adopted a symbolic statement demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 unless guardian approval is granted. Although it cautions of the "habit-forming" nature of these services, the move does not create binding law.

"A strong age restriction is a useful foundation," commented the parliamentarian supporting the initiative.

Britain: A Watchful Eye

In the UK, the administration has not ruled out a possible ban, stating that "nothing is being dismissed" but insisting any decision must be "grounded in robust data".

Previously, momentum built behind a proposal to enact controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually watered down. Instead, the government pledged to further research the topic.

Campaign organizations have voiced apprehensions. A prominent charity established by the loved ones of a young person who died after encountering disturbing online content argues that a blanket age ban might not improve online safety and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of risk when users reach the legal age.

"This ban is a reaction to the inability of the social media companies to design platforms and apps that are secure and suitable for young users," stated a leading child protection advocate.

The United States: A Fragmented Landscape

Stateside, action is mostly happening at the regional level against a backdrop of federal gridlock.

• Utah mandates parental consent for under-18s to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a measure banning under-14s from accessing social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation limiting under-16s to a single hour of social media access per day, with any further time needing adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also enacted bills demanding guardian approval for under-16s to set up social media profiles.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from certain politicians to copy the Australian example, a federal ban is currently seen as unlikely.

International Perspectives

Beyond the West, further countries are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

But, global agencies take a more nuanced stance. The UN children's agency has warned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "might have unintended consequences". The body highlights that social networks can be a "lifeline" for marginalized young people and that government action should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to prioritize user protection.

Even as this international conversation continues, the steps of the Australian government and several other countries show that governments internationally are no longer content to delay for tech companies to act voluntarily.